|

Beyond the Name: How Arjun Tendulkar's Struggles Highlight Cricket's Nepotism Debate

Jyotirmay Dewangan | Updated: Jan 07, 2026, 06:30 IST
Beyond the Name: How Arjun Tendulkar's Struggles Highlight Cricket's Nepotism Debate
Image Source: Representative

The Weight of a Legend's Legacy

When Arjun Tendulkar walked out as opener for Goa in the Vijay Hazare Trophy - a big call by team management - all eyes followed the son of cricket's greatest icon. The experiment ended badly, failing to yield results and mirroring his previous first-class struggles. This pattern exposes Indian cricket's complex relationship with legacy players, where famous surnames create instant visibility but impossible expectations.

Systemic Advantages vs. Organic Growth

Arjun's promotion to opener despite modest domestic numbers raises hard questions. Do selectors fast-track 'legacy kids' hoping to replicate their parents' magic? Meanwhile, players like Yashasvi Jaiswal and Rajat Patidar - who climbed through Mumbai's maidans and MP's club circuits - face steeper paths to recognition despite consistent performances. The Vijay Hazare Trophy live updates showed established stars like KL Rahul and Shreyas Iyer battling form too (with both Jaiswal and Patidar also recording failures), yet only Arjun's failures trend nationally.

The Psychological Toll of Inherited Fame

Every Arjun Tendulkar dismissal sparks memes comparing him to Sachin, while his rare successes get dismissed as 'privilege'. This binary ignores how young players develop. Contrast this with Uttarakhand left-arm pacer Rajan Kumar, who received minimal attention until failing a NADA dope test and receiving provisional suspension. Both cases reveal cricket's uneven pressures: one crushed under public scrutiny, the other possibly cut down by systemic neglect of mental health in lower-tier teams.

Broader Cracks in Cricket's Foundation

The Vijay Hazare Trophy spotlight extends beyond nepotism debates. Shreyas Iyer's mid-tournament captaincy appointment for Mumbai on Monday - stepping in after Shardul Thakur's injury - highlights how established stars parachute into domestic cricket, sometimes disrupting team dynamics. Meanwhile, the provisional suspensions of cricketer Rajan Kumar and women's national team footballer Ratanbala Devi for doping violations exposes the talent development system's flaws - where some athletes feel compelled to take shortcuts while others benefit from pedigree.

Redefining Success in Shadow of Giants

Arjun Tendulkar's story isn't about talent alone - it's about cricket's obsession with bloodlines. Should we judge him against his father's 100 centuries, or as a domestic all-rounder finding his way? The same tournament saw future stars like Gill and Iyer grinding through failures too, but without viral takedowns. Until cricket addresses its unequal scrutiny of 'privileged' versus 'organic' talent, the pitch will never be level.

The Road Ahead for Indian Cricket

The solution lies neither in shunning legacy players nor in denying systemic advantages. Selectors must transparently communicate selection criteria across all tiers. Academies need psychological support for players bearing famous names and those fighting obscurity. Most importantly, fans must separate individual potential from generational legacies. As the Vijay Hazare Trophy continues, it's time to measure players by their runs and wickets - not just their surnames.